So I like FlashForward. It's not the greatest thing ever, but I find it pretty enjoyable. I don't think I'd recommend it to anyone that wasn't a big sci-fi fan.Still, I guess I'm always surprised how people want to make a claim about how a show is objectively bad. As if there's never been something they liked that someone else didn't call out as having "bad acting" and "boring characters". I don't enjoy some 99% of television programming, but someone obviously does and I don't see any point in my trying to point out why they're wrong. Or visa versa.I guess the part of it that bugs me is this idea that everything needs to appeal to me or it's flawed. Only something that works for everyone should be made. This sucks for me because I tend to like things that most people don't like. I actually joke about having a death-touch... any show that I dig is almost surely going to get cancelled (Firefly, Conviction, Daybreak, Sarah Connor Chronicles, etc...). I'm shocked Fringe is still on.I just wish someone would figure out how to make and market a show for the 20% or so of people who don't dig what's in the mainstream. FlashForward is one of those shows, and there are surely a few million people who like it (even if the author of this piece doesn't). Is that really proof that it sucks? Or that it shouldn't exist?